ITSA FOI Disclosure Log

Freedom of information disclosure log Subsection 11C(3) of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 requires agencies to publish on their websites details of information released pursuant to FOI request received by them (other than documents referred to in subsection 11C(1), which includes personal information about a person or information about the business, commercial, financial or professional affairs of a person, if it would be unreasonable to publish the information). In accordance with those requirements, set out below are descriptions of such information/documents released by ITSA. Information attached to, or referred to in, ITSA’s disclosure log will generally be removed after 12 months, unless the information has enduring public value. Date access granted FOI request sought access to Documents released 5 April 2012 Web browser and social media use guidelines or policies Acceptable Use of ICT Resources Policy [PDF 401KB] Online personal media use by ITSA staff policy ITSA is committed to upholding the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. Work is underway across the Australian Government to achieve compliance in line with the Web Accessibility National Transition Strategy. There are documents in the disclosure log that are currently not available in HTML format. If you would like hard copies of any documents shown above or assistance accessing them, please contact ITSA’s FOI coordinator at foi@itsa.gov.au or FOI Coordinator Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia GPO Box 821 CANBERRA ACT 2601 We will try to meet reasonable requests for an alternative format of the document in a timely manner and at the lowest reasonable cost to you. You will be notified if any charge is payable and required to pay the charge before the information is provided.

Page Last Updated: 03/05/2012     Contact us |  Online feedback form |  Privacy Policy |  Disclaimer & Copyright

Australian Federal police accepts no responsibility for investigation standards

---

Subject: RE: Breaches of the AGIS and negligence of the AFP [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:19:37 +1000
From: No-Reply@afp.gov.au
To: FIONABROWN01@HOTMAIL.COM

UNCLASSIFIED

Reference is made to your correspondence to the Australian Federal Police (AFP) dated 12 August 2012 regarding your enquiry about AGIS.

The AFP is the primary law enforcement agency responsible for investigating crimes against the Commonwealth of Australia. From the information you have provided, it appears that no relevant Commonwealth offences have been committed and therefore the matters raised cannot be investigated by the AFP.

The AFP does not hold overarching powers over other Commonwealth Agencies. 

You may wish to contact the Commonwealth Ombudsman.  Their contact details can be found at www.ombudsman.gov.au

A copy of your correspondence has been recorded by the AFP.

www.afp.gov.au

NCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

From: Commissioner
Sent: Sunday, 12 August 2012 3:09 PM
To: Mackell, Tamerra
Subject: FW: Breaches of the AGIS and negligence of the AFP

-------------------------------------------
From: fiona brown[SMTP:FIONABROWN01@HOTMAIL.COM]
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2012 3:09:19 PM
To: Commissioner
Subject: RE: Breaches of the AGIS and negligence of the AFP
Auto forwarded by a Rule

Re AGIS

.Dear Commissioner Negus,
 I refer to the following email to which I have received no reply.
I will ask you again and make it clear to you what I am seeking.
 What safeguards have the Australian Federal Police  put in place that Australian Government Agencies comply with  Australian Government Investigation standards?
Again this is another example of the incompetence of the Australian Federal Police who posses no obvious  powers in Australia.

Please could you advise me  how the Federal Police also  intend to  monitor this taking into consideration clear lack of foresight?

As with my previous email I remind you that should this matter go to court you will be subpoenaed to justify why the Commonwealth Ombudsman and the Australian Public Service Commission are able to protect  systemic corrupt conduct in Government Agencies using the investigation methods that you have revised.  

Thank you

Fiona Brown 

---

From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
To: commissioner@afp.gov.au
Subject: Breaches of the AGIS and negligence of the AFP
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 12:43:42 +1000

 

.Dear Mr Negus,
I understand  the Australian Federal Police has been involved  in a programme which has revised the  IGIS, or Australian Government Investigation standards.
 You will be aware this is a requirement under the Financial and Accountability Act.
I am also aware all Government Agencies involved in this must complete training programmes.
However, Internal noncompliance with legislation in Government Agencies have allowed systemic corrupt conduct to flourish.
This is particular in the Insolvency Trustee Service, Commonwealth Ombudsman and the Australian Public Service Commission.
It is clear now that although investigation standards do exist there is no safeguard that agencies comply with them.
I am  now refer to section 4.8
Agencies are to refer any matters to the AFP for possible investigation where there is substantial evidence of criminal activity or suspected criminal activity by a member of an Agency fraud investigation , control prevention or compliance unit. The AFP will also consider investigating matters where there could  be a real or perceived conflict of interest if the matter were to be investigated by the Agency concerned(for instance , where the allegations concerns a member of the executive with some responsibility for the Agency's investigation function)
 The Insolvency trustee Service Australia is aware it's Principal Legal Officer Matthew Osborne is giving Legal Advice to Trustee that the Bankruptcy Act may be breached using S134(3). This gives discretion to  a trustee, however it is limited only to property realized.
According to Matthew Osborne this section gives a trustee discretion on all aspects of the Bankruptcy Act. It even extends to discretion as to misleading creditors.
Please would the Australian Federal Police  advise me what powers have been put in place by them when they are made aware of the serious breaches by a number of Government agencies of the AGIS to cover up atrocious misconduct.
If this matter should go to court  be aware I will  subpoena you  to give evidence  on your negligence .

Thank You

Fiona Brown

**********************************************************************                                 WARNING This email message and any attached files may contain information that is confidential and subject of legal privilege intended only for use by the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.   If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient be advised that you have received this message in error and that any use, copying, circulation, forwarding, printing or publication of this message or attached files is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information contained therein. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your inbox. AFP Web site: http://www.afp.gov.au **********************************************************************

---

From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
To: commissioner@afp.gov.au
Subject: Breaches of the AGIS and negligence of the AFP
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 12:43:42 +1000

.Dear Mr Negus,
I understand  the Australian Federal Police has been involved  in a programme which has revised the  IGIS, or Australian Government Investigation standards.
 You will be aware this is a requirement under the Financial and Accountability Act.
I am also aware all Government Agencies involved in this must complete training programmes.
However, Internal noncompliance with legislation in Government Agencies have allowed systemic corrupt conduct to flourish.
This is particular in the Insolvency Trustee Service, Commonwealth Ombudsman and the Australian Public Service Commission.
It is clear now that although investigation standards do exist there is no safeguard that agencies comply with them.
I am  now refer to section 4.8
Agencies are to refer any matters to the AFP for possible investigation where there is substantial evidence of criminal activity or suspected criminal activity by a member of an Agency fraud investigation , control prevention or compliance unit. The AFP will also consider investigating matters where there could  be a real or perceived conflict of interest if the matter were to be investigated by the Agency concerned(for instance , where the allegations concerns a member of the executive with some responsibility for the Agency's investigation function)
 The Insolvency trustee Service Australia is aware it's Principal Legal Officer Matthew Osborne is giving Legal Advice to Trustee that the Bankruptcy Act may be breached using S134(3). This gives discretion to  a trustee, however it is limited only to property realized.
According to Matthew Osborne this section gives a trustee discretion on all aspects of the Bankruptcy Act. It even extends to discretion as to misleading creditors.
Please would the Australian Federal Police  advise me what powers have been put in place by them when they are made aware of the serious breaches by a number of Government agencies of the AGIS to cover up atrocious misconduct.
If this matter should go to court  be aware I will  subpoena you  to give evidence  on your negligence .

Thank You

Fiona Brown

FOI ITSA

Under Freedom of Information I have requested a copy of ITSA's Investigation policy and also what qualifications Adam Toma and Mark Findlay   have attained to do investigations as required under the Australian Government Investigation Standards.
As the APSC has no investigation policy it could be reasonable to  assume that ITSA also do not have one.
This is not to be confused with ITSA's complaint handling policy where Mark Findlay and all the Dumb Fucks working for Bankruptcy Relations are fucking everyone over on the advice of Matthew Osborne.
Taking into consideration Karin Fisher and Commissioner Steve Sedgwick from the APSC  is protecting the Agency Head of ITSA  Veronique Ingram it will be interesting what else I uncover under FOI.

Senator John Williams

Senator John Williams is the NSW National Party Senator  who has an interest in the Insolvency Trustee Service Australia where Veronique Ingram is fucking everyone over. This pursuit may be noble but anyone contacting Senator Williams is only being told half the story of  what is occurring.
Simply put this is like having sex without the orgasm!!
Instead of putting their heads up their arses the staff at Senator Williams office should be informing anyone that is complaining about ITSA what is actually occurring.

First of all, Matthew Osborne Principal Legal Officer at ITSA is adving  trustees that S134(3)  allows them to breach the Bankruptcy Act.
Go to the Bankruptcy Act.....................

 

 After 128N.   Definitions ..... you will see the heading Division 4--Realization of property 

this section  runs from S129-S139 and deals with realization of property. It does not give discretion to the trustee to mislead or fuck anyone over as fucking Matthew Osborne  is informing trustees.

This section is limited. It is easily misread if you fail to look at the headings.

Did Senator Williams tell you all this???? I think not........

Karin Fisher APSC Head of Ethics

Karin Fisher is Head of Ethics at the Australian Public Service Commission.
So............................ Karin Fisher come kiss my fucking Arse!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!





Is it derelict of duty or Fraud  that this fucking skank is protecting systemic corrupt conduct at the Commonwealth Ombudsman and by the other skank Veronique Ingram head of the Insolvency Trustee Service Australia.

The Australian Public service Commission have admitted they do not have an investigation policy.
This allows Karin Fisher and the faggy Steve Sedgwick to fuck over everyone who makes a complaint.
Fairwork Australia was criticized this week  for also failing to have an investigation policy.
How many  Government Agencies also do not have one?
Under Freedom of Information  the Investigation policies of ITSA and the  Commonwealth  Ombudsman were sought. As yet I have had no response.

ITSA is using S134(3) to fuck everyone over.  Mathew Osborne is giving this advise to all Trustees.

When he told me this he thouht I was a TRUSTEE. I had to ask him twice because I did not believe what I heard the first time.

Extensive evidence was provided to the Commonwealth Ombudsman who did a deal with ITSA to cover the matter up.

Under S  41(f) of the APS Act the Commissioner is required to look into such breaches of the APS  Act.

The  Australian Public service made a deliberate decision that they would cover this matter up which is abuse of Office.

 

so Karin Fisher( Ethics) and Steve Sedgwick( Commissioner) come kiss my ARSE and now it has been  exposed you have no fucking investigatin policy  you can also fucking lick my Arse all over.

Colin Neave /Administrative ReveiwCouncil/ Commonwealth Ombudsman

Australia has now got a new shonky Commonwealth Ombudsman Colin Neave who replaced Alison Larkins who was acting in the role of the Commonwealth Ombudsman. As the Banking Industry Ombudsman Colin Neave only investigated 18% of complaints. This clearly shows this faggert is unfit to become Commonwealth Ombudsman

Alison Larkins was referred to the Australian Public Service Commissioner in December 2011 under section 41(f) of the Ombudsmans Act for breaches of the  APS Code of conduct  and non compliance of the Ombudsmans Act.

The Australian Public Service Commissioner Steve Sedgwick attempted to cover this matter up and fuck over anyone who made a complaint and had the necessary evidence of  systemic corrupt at  Commonwealth Ombudsman.
In fact the APS Commissioner received 33 similar complaints from whistleblowers and  referrals under s41(f) and he fucked over all of them but one.
Under FOI it was revealed that the AGIS are not applied by either the Commonwealth Ombudsman or the .Australian Public Service Commission. This allows serious systemic corrupt conduct to flourish in Government Agencies.
Coin Neave as a former Banking industry Ombudsman would be aware of this systemic corrupt conduct.

Part of the selection panel who appointed  Colin Neave to this position was the Australian Public Service Commission.

How fucking funny............... Australia now has another shonkey  Commonwealth Ombudsman  who is clearly aware of how Government Agencies  fuck  people over by failing to comply with the Acts for which they are responsible and  fail to comply with the APS Code of Conduct. The APS  who fucks anyone over who complains about Agency Heads was part of the process. Who's arse did Colin Neave kiss in the APS to get them to select him.

It is a fact that Steve Sedgwick Commissioner of the APS is corrupt.

 

 

.As Banking Industry Ombudsman Colin Neaves fucked over people who complained about the Banking industry... how many more will he fuck over as Commonwealth Ombudsman???????

Serious corrupt conduct at the Commonwealth Ombudsman

In the Commonwealth Ombudsman's Annual report 2010-2011 there were 579 complaints about the Commonwealth Ombudsman. 324 were trashed as would be expected to try and hide their fuck-ups though 223 were found to need further investigation.
Taking this into consideration that the  Ombudsman found that they had fucked up 223 complaints themselves , the Commonwealth Ombudsman failed to complete any further investigations which would show a complete lack of compliance with Australian Government Investigation Standards. This would also show  an attempt to cover up serious non compliance with the Ombudsmans Act and also an attempt to fuck over Australians who complained about the Commonwealth Ombudsman protecting Government Agencies.