Australian Federal Police Corruption
The following letter was sent by Dr Janet Wilson to every member of the Australian Parliament in July 2011.
To date, no reply has been forthcoming. All previous attempts to raise these issues have been similarly ignored.
Dear Prime Minister,
Could
I humbly draw your attention to the disturbing suggestion that the AFP
should investigate the recently published allegations regarding the
placement of marijuana into Schapelle Corby's boogie board bag in
October 2004?
Could
you please consider this partial list of the many serious issues which
would pre-determine the outcome of such a course of action?
1.
I would first refer you to the Senate Estimate hearing of 26th May
2011. In a nutshell, Commissioner Negus spent seven minutes shamefully
covering for the political prosecution of Allan Kessing. He flatly
refused to investigate the appalling suppression of evidence at Mr
Kessing's trial, BY THE AFP THEMSELVES, which subverted the course of
justice and condemned him.
2.
Negus refused to even look at the possibility of re-visiting the
whistleblower investigation, despite the new and confirmed evidence that
a number of other individuals were able to leak the documents. Contrast
this with the extensive operation to investigate and seize the
royalties from Schapelle Corby's book, which were desperately needed for
a special appeal and for medications. This was undertaken by the AFP
with zeal.
3.
You will be aware that the Kessing Reports showed systemic corruption
and criminality at the airports, and particularly at Sydney. They showed
that this crossed multiple agencies and organizations, and that drug
syndication was out of control. I refer you Mr Kessing's interview of
4th April 2011: http://schapellegate.com/2010/11/allan-kessing-interview-4th-april-2011.html.
You
will, perhaps, be aware of how politically damaging this information
would have been at the time. It was also, however, absolutely critical
to Schapelle Corby, and it was WITHHELD and hidden from her throughout.
4.
The evidence of drug syndication, including the common use of innocent
passengers as mules, was well documented, and the AFP was demonstrably
awash with it. You may recall that people were actually coming forward,
having found marijuana in their bags when they arrived overseas.
And yet, two weeks before Schapelle Corby's verdict, Commissioner Keelty told the media, and thus the Bali court, that: "There
is very little intelligence to suggest that baggage handlers are using
innocent people to traffic heroin or other drugs between states". Why do you imagine he said that?
5.
Did you know that the Law Council were appalled?. Yet they had no idea
that it was not even true, and further, that the AFP KNEW that it was
not true.
6. Do you recall that "Operation Mocha"
was well underway when Keelty made that statement? This was the
operation which netted all those corrupt baggage handlers. It was also
the operation under which drugs were being syndicated on the same day,
and at the same time, as Schapelle Corby passed through, and it was in
exactly the same area. Please check it and see for yourself.
7. Are you aware that the head of Operation Mocha was Mark Standen, currently on trail for conspiring to import $120 million of pre-cursor drugs into Australia?
8.
Whatever happened to the charges against all those sacked baggage
handlers? Brushing them under the carpet was quite handy in preventing a
re-focus on the Schapelle Corby travesty and, of course, on all those
grubby areas it was best to keep hidden.
9.
Have you never wondered how three Australian airports failed to deliver
a single frame of CCTV footage, with Schapelle Corby begging for it?
Have you looked at the AFP's comments to the Senate and elsewhere on
this disturbing matter, and compared them with other accounts?
10.
Have you ever researched the background of AFP corruption at the
airports, and considered the words of former officers, like Ray Cooper,
and Gary Lee-Rogers (who died of 'natural causes' in a pool of blood,
having attempted to whistle blow)?
11.
Does it not strike you as rather strange that the AFP should refuse to
investigate Schapelle Corby, or seize her bank records in Australia,
when she actually begged for a full investigation?
12.
Why did the AFP brief the media against Schapelle Corby, and why were
multiple statements, which are now known to be entirely false, made to
Parliament?
13.
Why do you imagine that the Bali police stated that it was the AFP who
refused to test the marijuana for country of origin, which Schapelle
Corby had formally requested?
14.
The Schapelle Corby case threatened not only Australia's political
relationship with Indonesia, but the AFP's close working relationship
with the INP. Is it not interesting that Commissioner Keelty made so
many comments which were damaging to Schapelle Corby, during a period of
intense interaction with his INP counterpart and others?
15,
Why have the government refused to engage with either of the two
international research groups who, for two years, have been intensively
investigating and documenting this, and other corruption, relating to
Schapelle Corby?
NOTE:
This list is a small selection from the substantial catalogue, and I
have limited it to public domain information for ease of reference.
THE POLITICAL MISSION
Regrettably,
the truth of this matter is that the AFP have been on a political
mission, fuelled additionally by the self interest motivate to hide
internal corruption, indifference and incompetence.
From
the very start, the Schapelle Corby case was a serious threat. It
risked exposing a shocking web of criminality through the airports,
including the role of the police. It was a threat to the commercial
interests of Qantas and the newly privatised SACL. It threatened
relations with Indonesia.
We know the inevitable outcome, as the government of the day wilfully abandoned and sacrificed her to a terrible fate.
URGENT QUESTIONS
So, could you explain why the AFP would now be allowed to play any role at all, in ANY matter, relating to Schapelle Corby?
Do you really believe that they will do anything which risks exposing a truth which will inevitably damn them?
How
many injustices will you allow Schapelle Corby endure, before she
escapes her torture by dying horribly on her filthy cell floor?
Or, will you finally act, and bring this mentally ill and innocent woman home to a hospital, whilst you still can?
I look forward to hearing from you.
Janet Wilson (Dr)
"What we have here is a steaming septic pit where everybody is running for cover and refusing to answer simple questions"
~ A Kessing |
To date, no reply has been forthcoming. All previous attempts to raise these issues have been similarly ignored.
No comments:
Post a Comment