Rober Cornall AO

.
Under the Financial Management and Accountability Act , and according to the Australian Government Investigation Standards( AGIS) Commonwealth Government Departments and Agencies  are required to comply  appropriate guidelines that would make the handling of complaints transparent.  Investigators are required to have also the appropriate  level of training.
In  2010-2011 the Australian Public Service Commission received 33 complaints from whistleblowers and also under S41(f) of the APS ACT.
The Skank  Karin Fisher and Commissioner Steve Sedgwick fucked over and covered up all of these complaints but one which was investigated by Robert Cornall .
Clearly , in his position as the Secretary  Attorney General Department there would have been a conflict of interest in his role to  investigate a complaint made under section 41(f)
This would be like asking the Catholic Church to investigate the Catholic Church or asking Corrupt Adam Toma to investigate the now deregistered trustee  Paul Anthony Pattison. It has now become clear that the reason Adam Toma failed to  competently investigate Pattison is because they were both on the take.
Robert Cornall was awarded an AO for his service to the Community through contributions to the development  of Public Policy.
Simply put Public Policy is an attempt by a government to address a public issue, however it has been shown that it is of little value to put guidelines into effect if there is a failure to  have these correctly adhered to.
Robert Cornall with his fists holding his balls,   clearly has covered up a detailed complain made about an Agency Head with the clear knowledge that being a past or  currently employed by the attorney Generals Office  would have made him unsuitable as an investigator in this matter. The 2 past Attorney Generals Philip Ruddock and Robert McClelland had actively covered up atrocious conduct at ITSA.
A recent example of the Attorney General Nicola Roxan  attempting  to cover up corrupt conduct was in the mater of Peter Slipper and James  Ashby. Also Nicola Roxan complained that the opposition leader Tony Abott was a misogynous and hated women is very tiring. Nicola Roxan should consider that Mr Abott( who wanted to become a priest after fathering a child who turned out to be another man's after a DNA test was done 30 years latter) just doesn't like the look of Skanky Hoe's.Or maybe Nicola Roxan was referring to the matter of Pauline Hanson  where Tony Abott set up a slush fund to have her charged and consequently jailed. I am sure there was certain hatred in this matter by the MAD MONK.

0

Add a comment

Paul Anthony Pattison Deregistration by Justice North

This is the Federal Court Judgement by Justice North after this trustee was found to have fucked over numerous bankrupts  For a long period of time he had been protected by ITSA, Veronique Ingram and the corrupt Adam Toma

23 April 2012

Today, Mr Paul Anthony Pattison, of Melbourne Victoria, was deregistered as a trustee in Bankruptcy.

The decision follows a Federal Court of Australia order in July 2011 accepting Mr Pattison’s voluntary resignation from his 272 active matters. 

Mr Pattison resigned as trustee of these matters and gave an undertaking that he would cease to carry out, consent to, or otherwise accept appointment as a trustee, unless and until he produced evidence in a form acceptable to ITSA or to the Court demonstrating he has the practice and financial capacity to adequately and properly carry out his duties as a trustee.

Since that time Mr Pattison has not been administering any bankruptcy matters. Mr Pattison had been the subject of lengthy investigations conducted by ITSA relating to his capacity to adequately and properly carry out his duties as a registered trustee and to re-start a personal insolvency practice.

As a result of these concerns a statutory committee was convened by the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy. The committee included an experienced registered trustee nominated by the Insolvency Practitioners Association of Australia. 

After weighing the evidence and interviewing Mr Pattison the committee concluded there was sufficient evidence to warrant the cancellation of Mr Pattison’s registration. Upon receipt of the committee’s report this morning, the Inspector-General in Bankruptcy gave effect to the decision and immediately moved to deregister Mr Pattison. 

Veronique Ingram, ITSA Chief Executive and Inspector-General in Bankruptcy, said that she appreciated that the committee decision to cancel Mr Pattison’s registration is one that is made following due process and intense deliberation. 

“In accordance with my obligations prescribed in the Bankruptcy Act I have today formally given effect to the committee’s decision. 

“The Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia has a key role to play in maintaining the integrity of Australia’s personal insolvency system. 

“ITSA will continue to work with practitioners and take proactive disciplinary action where appropriate to ensure stakeholders maintain confidence in the system," she said.

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Adam Toma ITSA's propoganda

Acosta, Victoria - ITSA prevents fake bankruptcy ploy by jilted lover

.

1. Acosta, Victoria - ITSA prevents fake bankruptcy ploy by jilted lover

   4 October 2012
   
   
   
   4 October 2012
   
   
   Alain Omar Acosta of Deer Park, Victoria was convicted in the Melbourne Magistrates Court yesterday in relation to offences under the Criminal Code Act 1995.
   
   
   Mr Adam Toma, National Manager of Insolvency and Trustee Service Australia’s (ITSA) regulation and enforcement business area, said yesterday:
   
   
   “Acosta’s actions were malicious and deliberate with total disregard for his victims and the integrity of the insolvency system.”
   
   
   Acosta, a twenty six year old unemployed office manager was charged with making and producing false documents to ITSA, namely, Debtors’ Petitions and Statements of Affairs completed in the names of six (6) young females known to him with the intention of having them declared bankrupt.
   
   
   This is the propaganda released by Adam Toma, the corrupt National Enforcement Manager at ITSA .
   
   
   .
   
   
   The Insolvency system requires a petitioner to lodge a petition either with the Federal Court or the Federal Magistrates Court. This must be accompanied with a Fee. If it is in the Federal Magistrates court it is approximately $800 and in the Federal Court around $2,200.
   
   
   The petitioner is then required to appear in court with the relevant parers. Obviously Mr Acosta had not done this so it now shows that the oversight would have been that ITSA 's
   
   
   If these procedures are not completed then there is no possibility of Bankruptcy.
   
   
   ***********
   
   
   Adam Toma and ITSA then went on to report...............
   
   
   The offences came to light when a victim received documentation from ITSA advising that her bankruptcy application had been accepted. The victim then contacted ITSA to advise she did not lodge the documents and was solvent.
   
   
   Her bankruptcy was reversed. ITSA was able to pick up on other suspect documents as there were numerous similarities between them.
   
   
   The fact that ITSA accepted documents that had not been though the correct channels shows this report from ITSA is complete propaganda and full of Shit.
   
   
   If this matter was ever legitimate Mr Acosta would have paid a considerable amount of money as ITSA claimed there were 3 women who were victims.
   
   
   Mr Toma said.....
   
   
   " This outcome highlights the vital role of ITSA’s enforcement program"
   
   
   So .... clearly there appears also another agenda for this story.
   
   
   Acosta could not have filed false papers with ITSA because the correct procedure was not adhered to.
   
   
   Adam Toma continues to try and fuck over and intimidate those who he considers to be targets.
   
   
   Clearly Adam Toma is leaving behind a paper trail he did not intend anyone to ever find.
   
   
   Did Adam Toma also profit from this case???
   
   
   After contacting the Victorian Magistrates Court they requested $75 to get a copy of this decision. If this matter was genuine and this matter only concerned ITSA Enforcement then Adam Toma should have put Magistrate Rozencwajg decision on ITSA site.
   
   
   .
   
   
   Did not this dumb Magistrate realize that Mr Acosta had not filed false Bankruptcy Papers because the Bankruptcy Process had not been complied with in the first place.
   
   
   Magistrate Rozencwajk was the magistrate who sentenced Derryn Hinch for broadcasting the names of Rockspiders.
   
   
   .
   
   
   By Noel McNamara on August 11th, 2011
   
   
   Derryn Hinch is a man who speaks without fear or favour and when Derryn (who has been a great support of victims and their rights for as manys years as I have been in a very unbalance justice system), under these two Attorney Generals when they were in office the late Jim Kennen and who could forget the Rob Hulls years some how because of their leniency to violent criminals especially Rob Hulls with the bleeding heart magistrates, and judges appointed to the judicial chambers, we at CVSA start to question if they knew what side they were meant to bat for.
   Now we have always had suppression order in our our courts that is meant to protect the victims where they could be identified. Fair enough, a good thing but the bleeding hearts decided to beef it up a bit by bringing in suppression orders to protect vile pedophiles, rapists and all sex offenders.
   Derryn Hinch was among many of us at a rally on the steps of Parliament where we all named these vile creatures in the interest of ours children and grandchildren. What followed after that was like Hitler’s Germany, Derryn was charged and the rest of us waited for summonses that never came, go figure. After that the rest is history. Derryn cops five months home detention from a magistrate called Charlie Rozencwajg. I thought that this sentence was a disgrace and that if they were still in Government Hulls mob, they would have a Reverse Sex Offender list for Derryn.
   Charlie Rozencwajg would have to be one of Rob Hulls’ bleeding hearts appointed to the bench as he told us his thoughts on justice which they believes belongs to them not the people who pay their wages. Charlie told the court that Hinch had campaigned for the abolition of suspender sentences and encouraged the passing of a “one size fits all approach which removed judicial discretion” in sentencing. Such an approach would lead to injustices, the magistrate said.
   Charlie, that is what victims have had to put up with for years, suck it up charlie it is now happening…
   
   
   
   
   Derryn Hinch is fighting to avoid a jail sentence for breaching suppression orders. Source: Herald Sun
   
   
   OUTSPOKEN broadcaster Derryn Hinch could face four years’ jail for publicly naming two sex offenders – if doctors can save his life with an emergency liver transplant.
   
   
   Hinch, who has been told he has only three months to live due to cancer, was found guilty on four counts of contempt of court for naming the sex offenders in the face of suppression orders.
   
   
   In front of a courtroom packed with Hinch supporters, Magistrate Charlie Rozencwajg dismissed one charge against the radio commentator, but found four others proven.
   
   
   Those four charges relate to Hinch naming the sex offenders on his website and at a rally on the steps of Parliament in 2008.
   
   
   A resolute Hinch has decided to run his own defence and do the talking at his plea hearing.
   
   
   “I know that people say that a man who represents himself has a fool for a client … but just for the plea, I know who I am and what I’ve done, and I think it’s only fair I do it myself,” he said.
   
   
   In March, Hinch lost a High Court constitutional challenge to secrecy provisions in Victoria’s serious sex offender laws. The 67-year-old now faces jail for the second time in his career.
   
   
   Chief Crown prosecutor Gavin Silbert, SC, told Mr Rozencwajg a custodial term would normally be expected.
   
   
   As a sentencing option, Mr Rozencwajg asked for Hinch to be assessed for home detention, though he stressed that did not indicate his eventual sentence.
   
   
   Hinch stuck to his guns outside court.
   
   
   “I’m not sorry for what I’ve done,” he said. “It’s a good cause and the law’s a bad law …their names are suppressed and that is just bloody wrong.”
   
   
   Hinch said he would still campaign for a public register of sex offenders.
   
   
   “I’m glad to see the Herald Sun’s come out editorially in supporting that idea,” he said.
   
   
   Hinch will return to the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court on June 21.
   
   
   andersonp@heraldsun.com.au
   
   
   Categorized under: Law and Order.
   
   
   Tagged with: no tags.
   
   
   One Response to “Magistrate Charlie Rozencwajg suck it up! Leniant sentences are on the way out.”
   
   
   1. Warwick says:
   
   
   December 21, 2011 at 9:00 am
   
   
   Two points to make:
   
   
   1. Apparently Derryn Hinch was told he had liver cancer and had three months to live so Charlie Rozencwajg gives him a five month home detention sentance!! Bright!! Go figure!!
   
   
   2. Derryn Hinch is given a five month home detention sentance and is banned from engaging in gainful employment. Given Derryn Hinch’s trade then isn’t that a restraint of trade under the Act!! Go figure!! A case for abuse of process perhaps?
   
   
   
   
   1. 
      
   
   
   
   
   
   
   

Posted 1 minute ago by bankruptcy coverup by ombudsman

0

Add a comment

Commonwealth Ombudsman has no investigation policy

 

---

From: fionabrown01@hotmail.com
To: ombudsman@ombudsman.gov.au
Subject: RE: Your FOI request of 13 September 2012 [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 12:58:48 +1100

To
Luke Phelps
FOI Officer Commonwealth Ombudsman,

Dear Luke,
I understand you do not understand my request.
In the 2010/2011 Commonwealth  Ombudsmans  statistics there are  579 complaints made about the Commonwealth Ombudsman. I am seeking a copy of each of these complaints.
I understand the Commonwealth  Ombudsman consider this  too  difficult and  wish to refuse my request for  purely practical reasons.
To overcome this, I would accept that the Commonwealth Ombudsman  email me 15  copies of the complaints made to the Commonweath Ombudsman each week for a year . This should dramatically  lighten your workload.
I refer to the statistics
Category 1—resolved without investigation, outcomes include decisions not to investigate and referrals to appropriate agency or authority
Category 2—cannot be resolved at category 1 and require further internal enquiries/research or more information from the complainant, resolved without contacting the agency
Category 3—investigation conducted and agency contacted

I also understand that the Commonwealth Ombudsman has no investigation policy, no one at the Commonwealth Ombudsman has any investigation qualifications and Australian Government Investigation standards do not apply to the Commonwealth  Ombudsman. Is this correct?? Could you  pease respond to this.
I would understand that according to the Financial Management  and Acountability Act  this would require that  this is complied with. Clearly you will be aware that that failure to comply with  the AGIS would allow the Commonwealth  Ombudsman to be seen to condone corrupt conduct and even corruption.
You will understand this is not the role of the Commonwealth Ombudsman .
I also now would request under FOI that the Commonwealth Ombudsman also suppy me with a copy of the 70 complaints made to them about the Insolvency Trustee Service Australia in the same financial year.
Thank you
Fiona Brown